How You Look Could Cost You

DSC_0951For years, so-called experts have theorized that the constant evolution of pop icon’s Michael Jackson’s appearance was due to his need to be “accepted” by others. For some reason, he thought changing from what God gave him would make him more acceptable to the general public. Some have even gone as far as to say that Michael wanted to “be white.” The merits of those arguments will probably be debated for years, especially since now Michael is “larger than life”. But there is a growing body of evidence that indicates that how you look may actually have an effect on your pocketbook.

A recent study out of the Kellogg School of Management at my alma mater, Northwestern University, revealed that African American CEOs of Fortune 500 companies with a “babyface” look were more likely to lead companies with bigger revenues and influence than CEOs who look more mature. The study is supposed to be published in September in the Journal, “Psychological Science” by researcher Robert Livingston. What does it mean to have a babyface look? According to the study, a round face, full cheeks, larger foreheads, small nose, large ears, full lips and NO FACIAL HAIR. The opposite was true, according to the study, for white males, whose more “mature” look was rated higher. There is one quote from Livingston which was particularly troubling to me. He says “Physical appearance, how you behave, having mixed-race parents-anything that conveys to whites ‘I’m not the typical black man’ can be helpful.”

No wonder Michael Jackson wanted to change his looks. He didn’t want to be a “typical black man.” No wonder there is increasing pressure to fit in and look like others. The unspoken implication is that if people aren’t comfortable with the way you look, you may not receive the job, promotion, recognition that you deserve. There are major ramifications associated with this kind of thinking. The primary problem is that people who “don’t look like the others” who are extremely talented may be overlooked or ignored. That is a huge waste of talent and resources. And don’t think that women aren’t also put under a microscope. Previous studies have indicated that women with short hair are promoted more in corporate America than women with longer hair. What does that do the all the weave queens and Beyonce wannabes out there buying tons of hair every year?

And don’t think this kind of thinking is limited to the lives of celebrities and corporate CEOs. Just this April, United Airlines announced that it will charge passengers for two airplane seats if they can’t fit into one.  More than a third of American people are overweight and yet the size of most airline seats haven’t changed in decades. United says they are making the move to respond to the comfort and well-being of all of their guests. I wonder how comfortable and welcome an overweight guest feels when they are asked to pony up enough money for two airplane tickets or get off the flight? Americans have always been obsessed with beauty and power. Now it appears that not only are people being discriminated against either  overtly or covertly, it is also going to cost them.

4 Responses to “How You Look Could Cost You”

  1. Aldore Collier Says:

    I agree with you in that it is beyond sick that so many of us feel we must surrender parts of our ethnicity to appeal to the “larger” audience. You didn’t mention but certainly are aware that, for years, all we saw were European standards of beauty on magazine covers, television programs and popular music. Many blacks internalized that. Sadly, decades later, many of us still do. Even Oprah, your queen of daytime television, said she grew wanting to be white.

    As far as United Airlines, we are diametrically opposed. Few things are more painful and angering than to sit on a long flight with a very large person who ends up taking up their seat and part of yours. Certainly, large people shouldn’t be discriminated against, but if I pay for a seat I should be able to sit in the whole seat.

  2. cebreeze Says:

    Interesting. The LATimes, http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-gilman7-2009jul07,0,1839794.story, had a story today that Michael Jackson’s surgeries were to perhaps make him look less like the Dad he hated.

    Whatever the reason, imagery is powerful, and there are a lot of people spending billions of dollars on their external images changed, while this is the most corrupt, unethical society we have ever known.

    Gangsters are being put to shame by the tactics of big business. When has it ever been a joke that the BofA charges more for a loan than Fat Joey on the corner? We need change in a hurry.

  3. Ava Thompson Greenwell Says:

    Well said!

  4. Monica Briggs Anderson Says:

    It was refreshing to read your blog – although I’m a month late. Thank you for recognizing this love affair that Americans have with beauty!

    Not only are Americans obsessed with looks and discriminating based on weight but we do not make allowances for a person to lose weight, eat healthy, and get much needed exercise.

    We are expected to work 40+ hours per week to be successful – the more you work the better, drive ridiculous distances so someone can actually see you come to office and talk you to death while you try to get some work done, and spend all of our money on stuff that we absolutely don’t need so others will feel better about us.

    Why can’t we be happy with our God-given beauty? Maybe too many of us don’t really know God, because the country is too obsessed with ritual.

Leave a Reply